Legal Opinion
Garrett v. City of Shreveport
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1963No. 9951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLADNEY, Judge.
This suit by the owners of Lots 33 and 34 of the Currie Land Subdivision of Shreveport, primarily involves the constitutionality of Ordinance No. 184, referred to as the Shreveport Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of 1957. A writ of mandamus and a mandatory injunction is sought to require the Shreveport officials made defendants, to issue a permit to petitioners for the purpose of building a bowling alley on said property, all of which is predicated on a judicial declaration that the city’s zoning ordinance is unconstitutional. On submission to the trial court a peremptory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- City of New Orleans v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Plebst v. Barnwell Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & SonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. City of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Reeves v. North Shreve Baptist ChurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Garrett v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963