Krauss Co. v. Develle
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Justice.
Appellees, the City of New Orleans and its Director' of Finance, have moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the appellant is without pecuniary interest in the outcome thereof and also because a central issue thereof has allegedly become moot.
Plaintiff appellant, a retail merchant in New Orleans, seeks by this suit to recover city sales taxes in the amount of $1,367.80 paid under protest to that municipality upon merchandise sold within but delivered without the City of New Orleans in Nor vember and December of 1956. Purchases made in New Orleans for delivery elsewhere…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Succession of DamicoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Hirt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- First Nat. Bank v. LagroneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- State v. Whitehead Motor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Archer v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Emmons v. Agricultural Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Brock v. Tidewater Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Womack v. Louisiana Commission on Governmental EthicsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Red River Coors, Inc. v. McNamaraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Ewing v. SharpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.