Legal Opinion

Wilkes v. National Life & Accident Insurance

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 20, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment of the circuit court of Shelby county in favor of the defendant. A motion for a new trial was duly made by the defendant and overruled by the court, and an appeal prayed and granted to this court and errors assigned.

The parties will be referred to in this opinion as in their original status in the court below.

The plaintiff, Aaron Wilkes, a young colored man, sued the defendant to recover on a policy of life insurance designated as an endowment policy, with provision for sick and accident benefits. The bill of exceptions is very brief, and is in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dulany v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. Columbian Relief Fund Ass'n v. GrossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Underwood v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. Stubblefield v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  3. National Life & Accident Ins. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  4. Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. SpurlockCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API