Legal Opinion

National Life & Accident Ins. v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 20, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeAMIS, J.

From a recovery in behalf of its insured, John William Armstrong, the National Life & Accident Insurance Company has appealed in error to this court. We shall herein refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant.

The policy in suit, issued to plaintiff on June 16, 1913, provides for weekly benefits for sickness “to be paid for each period of seven consecutive days that insured is, by reason of illness, necessarily confined to bed and there visited professionally by a duly licenced and practicing physician. ’ ’ Invoking the foregoing policy provisions) the defendant insisted below, as here,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Dulany v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Home Protective Ass'n v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Columbian Relief Fund Ass'n v. GrossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Wilkes v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leftwich v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  3. Guarantee Trust Life Insurance v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  4. Mills v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Brandt v. Mutual Ben. Health & Acc. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API