Legal Opinion

Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. Spurlock

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 14, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is again before us on motion to dismiss the writs of error and supersedeas heretofore granted by us in this case, in that the supplemental record showed that the bill of exceptions was filed on August 31, 1931, and that the verdict and judgment had actually been made on June 22, 1931, but the same were entered of record by an order nunc pro tunc made on July 4, 1931.

This motion must be overruled, for the reason that the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial was not actually made and entered until July 4, 1931, and in that order the defendant was allowed sixty days in which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Insurance Co. v. ThorntonTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Borden Mills, Inc. v. McGahaTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Stubblefield v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  5. Bockman v. Mutual Health Benefit & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Hospital Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  3. Brandt v. Mutual Ben. Health & Acc. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  4. Brandt v. Mutual Ben. Health Acc. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  5. Erickson v. Hospital Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API