Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Flowers

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1994No. Docket 169088PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeff, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of the circuit court granting summary disposition to defendants. The circuit court determined it was without subject-matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs’ case, which was based on the Whistle-blowers’ Protection Act (wpa), MCL 15.361 et seq.; MSA 17.428(1) et seq., because plaintiffs had already initiated an administrative action with the Department of Labor pursuant to the wage and fringe benefits act, MCL 408.471 et seq.; MSA 17.277(1) et seq. We reverse the order granting summary disposition to defendants and remand this case to the circuit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cockels v. International Business Expositions, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Hopkins v. City of MidlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Tyrna v. Adamo, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Sargent v. Browning-Ferris IndustriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  2. Weishuhn v. Catholic Diocese of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Herbolsheimer v. SMS Holding Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Steele v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Bitar v. WakimMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API