Legal Opinion

Decatur v. Chas. H. Tompkins Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 2, 1928No. 4566PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

An appeal from a judgment entered upon a directed verdict for the defendant, in a suit for damages for personal injuries suffered as alleged by plaintiff by reason of the negligence of defendant.

The defendant, Charles H. Tompkins Company, is a corporation engaged in the business of erecting buildings of various kinds, and at the time of this occurrence it was constructing a large concrete warehouse in the city of Washington. The plaintiff, Decatur, is a carpenter by trade, of many years’ experience, who was hired by defendant to work in and about the building while under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armour v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Armour & Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Beique v. HosmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Walaszewski v. SchoknechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Gordon v. Raven Systems & Research, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Finkelstein v. Vulcan Rail & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Montgomery v. Houston Textile MillsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. United Roofing and Siding Company v. SeefeldMississippi Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API