People v. Germosen
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*824The prosecutor’s examination of defendant before the Grand Jury does not warrant dismissal of the charges on the ground that defendant was deprived of a fair opportunity to testify (see, CPL 190.50 [5]; People v Karp, 158 AD2d 378, 388-389 [dissenting opn of Sullivan, J.], revd 76 NY2d 1006). Defendant was permitted to make a full narrative statement of his version of events before the prosecutor examined him. The prosecutor’s questions with respect to defendant’s statement that the Grand Jury "should check…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. DarbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. KarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. KarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2014