Legal Opinion

People v. Germosen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*824The prosecutor’s examination of defendant before the Grand Jury does not warrant dismissal of the charges on the ground that defendant was deprived of a fair opportunity to testify (see, CPL 190.50 [5]; People v Karp, 158 AD2d 378, 388-389 [dissenting opn of Sullivan, J.], revd 76 NY2d 1006). Defendant was permitted to make a full narrative statement of his version of events before the prosecutor examined him. The prosecutor’s questions with respect to defendant’s statement that the Grand Jury "should check…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DarbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. KarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. KarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API