Legal Opinion

People v. Karp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1990PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The People appeal from an oral decision, rendered February 27, 1987, which dismissed, with leave to re-present, an indictment for reckless endangerment in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.25). Supreme Court issued a one-sentence ruling which states, 'T find that the questioning on the part of the District Attorney in the Grand Jury presentation was overly vigorous and that it prevented this Defendant from fully and fairly testifying and I therefore am dismissing the indictment against him with leave for the People to represent.”

On this appeal, we are confronted with the anomalous situation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. RegisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. VallesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. KarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. BurtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API