Legal Opinion

Fillpoint, LLC v. Maas

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 2012No. G045057PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1173Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

When Michael Maas sold his stock in Crave Entertainment Group, Inc. (Crave), to Handleman Company (Handleman), he signed a stock purchase agreement, which contained a three-year covenant not to compete. As part of Handleman’s acquisition of Crave, Maas—a Crave employee—also signed an employment agreement containing a one-year covenant not to compete, which would become operative when Maas’s employment with Crave was terminated. Maas resigned from Crave three years after its acquisition by Handleman. About six months later, he began working for Solutions 2 Go, Inc.,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Vacco Industries, Inc. v. Van Den BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Insurance Services v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. v. GaddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Albillo v. Ports O'Call Restaurant Corp. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. PetreeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. TarantinoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Ascension Insurance Holdings LLC v. Roberts F. UnderwoodCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  5. Blue Mountain Enterprises, LLC v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API