State v. Ham
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Monmouth Quarter Sessions.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The defendant was indicted under section 12 of the Werts law (Gen. Stat.,p. 1813, pl. 142), passed March 20th, 1889.
Section 142 provides that it shall be lawful for druggists to sell liquor by less measure than one quart, without license, if compounded or sold upon the prescription of a reputable physician, and declares that a sale contrary thereto shall constitute the offence of keeping a disorderly house.
The sixty-sixth section of the act of 1898 (Pamph. L.,p. 812) provides that it shall not be lawful for any person without license to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buck v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- State v. TerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905