Legal Opinion

State v. Ham

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 13, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On error to the Monmouth Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The defendant was indicted under section 12 of the Werts law (Gen. Stat.,p. 1813, pl. 142), passed March 20th, 1889.

Section 142 provides that it shall be lawful for druggists to sell liquor by less measure than one quart, without license, if compounded or sold upon the prescription of a reputable physician, and declares that a sale contrary thereto shall constitute the offence of keeping a disorderly house.

The sixty-sixth section of the act of 1898 (Pamph. L.,p. 812) provides that it shall not be lawful for any person without license to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buck v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. State v. TerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API