Robertson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from convictions for petit larceny. Appellants contend that there was not sufficient evidence to support their convictions and that they were denied effective assistance of counsel by the trial court’s failure to advise them of their right to have separate counsel at trial. They were represented at trial by a retained attorney. We affirm.
The record fails to show that the trial court apprised appellants of their right to be represented by individual counsel and that they knowingly and voluntarily waived such right and chose to be- represented by the same…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Malcus T. Clemons v. United States of America, David E. Clark v. United States of America, Alvin C. Hines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- George T. C. Lollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Howard Campbell, Jr. v. United States of America, Robert W. Glenmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Fred J. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Welch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- McIver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971