Fred J. Ford v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents again1 the vexing problem of counsel for co-defendants in a criminal case. Specifically we are presented with the question of the responsibility of the trial judge with respect to the retention or assignment of single counsel to represent co-defendants on trial. In Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 70, 62 S.Ct. 457, 465, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942), in which Glasser’s conviction was reversed because his lawyer was assigned to represent his co-defendant as well, the Court stated: “[T]he ‘Assistance of Counsel’ guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- George T. C. Lollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Howard Campbell, Jr. v. United States of America, Robert W. Glenmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- John Benson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. BerlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- United States v. Javan Foster, Javan Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Ronald Deberry and Julius EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.