Brantly v. Huff
Supreme Court of Georgia
Injunction. Evidence. Land. Roads and. bridges. Boundary. County matters. Presumptions. Charge of Court. Before Judge Grice. Bibb Superior Court. April Adjourned Term, 1878. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Justice.
1. The true original route of an ancient highway was in controversy, and the agreed issue was as to the location of a boundary line which was co-incident with one of the borders of that route. The cause on trial was a bill in equity in which Brantly was complainant, and Huff defendant, together with two public boards as co-defendants, one the county board of commissioners and the other the district board of road commissioners, the former board having power to order public roads to be laid out, altered or discontinued, and the latter having the immediate supervision of…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. FlannaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Bradley v. SheltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.