Bull v. American Bank and Trust Co. of Pa.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAHN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have sued defendants for damages resulting from the alleged violation of federal and state securities laws and state common law. Before me are defendants’ motions to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the motions to dismiss will be granted in part.
FACTS
These actions arise out of plaintiffs’ participation in the Star Bright Holsteins (SBH) program, an investment plan involving the purchase, breeding, and maintenance of herds of Holstein cattle for the accounts of investors seeking tax shelters. For purposes of deciding defendants’ motion to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- McCarter v. MitchamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Gruber v. Price WaterhouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Castle v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.