Legal Opinion

Bull v. American Bank and Trust Co. of Pa.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-4056, 84-4196 to 84-4199, 84-4465, 84-4466 and 84-4611PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAHN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have sued defendants for damages resulting from the alleged violation of federal and state securities laws and state common law. Before me are defendants’ motions to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the motions to dismiss will be granted in part.

FACTS

These actions arise out of plaintiffs’ participation in the Star Bright Holsteins (SBH) program, an investment plan involving the purchase, breeding, and maintenance of herds of Holstein cattle for the accounts of investors seeking tax shelters. For purposes of deciding defendants’ motion to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  2. McCarter v. MitchamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Gruber v. Price WaterhouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Castle v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API