Legal Opinion
State of Kansas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2001No. 00-3057, 00-3058, 00-3072 and 00-3119PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated interlocutory appeals arise from a district court order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Plaintiff State of Kansas. The order stays action on the National Indian Gaming Commission’s (NIGC) decision that a tract of non-reservation land in Kansas, under lease to DefendanU-Intervenor Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, constitutes “Indian lands” subject to the terms of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721. State ex rel. Graves v. United States, 86 F.Supp.2d 1094 (D.Kan.2000) (Miami Tribe III). Assuming other requisites of the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Pueblo of Santa Ana v. NashDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- STATE OF KANSAS v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- The Wilderness Society v. Kane County, UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2006