Legal Opinion
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Nash
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided April 10, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-0957 BB-LFGPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRUCE D. BLACK, District Judge.
This action comes before the Court on the Personal Representatives’ motion to dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction [Doc. 15], and the Honorable Judge Nan G. Nash’s motion to dismiss [Doc. 18]. Having read the briefs and the relevant caselaw, the Court will deny the Personal Representatives’ motion. The Court will then grant in part and deny in part Judge Nash’s motion.
Facts and Procedural Background
The Court derives the facts from the Complaint, see generally Doc. 1, and presumes them to be true for the sake of the present motions.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pueblo of Santa Ana v. NashDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013