Legal Opinion
Pravin B. SHAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY, D/B/A Halliburton Services, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1980No. 79-1314PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Pravin B. Shah, a native of India, brought this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging he was unlawfully terminated from his employment with the Halliburton Company because of his national origin and race. The district court granted summary judgment for Halliburton on the ground that Shah was barred by limitations from proceeding under either statute.
On appeal, Shah contends the district court erred (1) in concluding that the statutory period for purposes of filing…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shirley NULF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Clulow v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Jackson v. City of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Curtis Ray SAMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin CIVILETTI, Attorney General, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Antonio Devargas v. Robert Montoya, Antonio Devargas v. Clyde Malley, Roberto MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.