Legal Opinion

Clulow v. Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1983No. 80-1258PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing all counts of plaintiff-appellant Clulow’s amended complaint.1 Plaintiff Clulow generally alleges that his several involuntary commitments to mental institutions violated his due process rights and that his…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Drake v. City of Fort CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Marvin D. Baker v. The Board of Regents of the State of Kansas and University of Kansas Medical School--School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Colorado, Inc. , Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API