Legal Opinion
Jackson v. City of Bloomfield
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1984No. 83-1019PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Lucille Jackson and Byron Smith brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976) against the City of Bloomfield and various city officials (City). Plaintiffs alleged that their employment with the City was wrongfully terminated in retaliation for the exercise of their First *653Amendment rights. The City moved for judgment on the pleadings, asserting that the claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The district court denied the motion and certified the issue for immediate appeal. For the reasons set out below, we affirm.
Both plaintiffs were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chardon v. Fumero SotoSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gary Garcia v. Richard Wilson and Martin VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Balter v. Ethyl Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Donald Singer v. The Flying Tiger Line Inc., and Air Line Pilots Association, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Steven Ray Wycoff v. James Menke, Official of the Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Homer Williams and Mrs. Faye Williams v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.