Rupert v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed October 14, 1930:
Fritz, J.
As Rupert was injured while engaged in interstate transportation and the case comes within the federal Employers’ Liability Act, to entitle the plaintiff to recover, under the present federal statutes and decisions, she .must *566establish that there was negligence on the part of the defendant which, in whole or in part, caused Rupert’s injuries. New Orleans & N. E. R. Co. v. Harris, 247 U. S. 361, 367, 38 Sup. Ct. 535; Richter v. C., M. & St. P. R. Co. 176 Wis. 188, 186 N. W. 616.
It is undisputed that the space between the rails and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- McCoy v. Union Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Krantz v. KrantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Groh v. W. O. Krahn, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Harter v. DickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Radler v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Borg v. DowningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.