Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Union Elevated Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1918No. 190PublishedCited by 55 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

William A. McCoy, testator of plaintiffs in error, owned a hotel'situated at the northwest comer of Clark and Van Bttren Streets, Chicago. During 1897 defendants constructed along the latter street and in front of the building ans elevated passenger railroad of the ordinary type and have-continued to maintain and operate it. Charging that- construction, maintenance and operation of the railroad had caused and would continue to cause injury to the property by noise, smoke, dirt, shutting off air and light, disturbing privacy and impairing the freedom of ingress and egress and that its market…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Dorce v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  3. Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
  4. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API