Borg v. Downing
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed March 31, 1936:
Fritz, J.
In commencing this action, plaintiff, in his complaint, alleged a cause of action to recover damages from the defendant for his breach of contract to drill a well for plaintiff, by defendant’s failure to use usual and ordinary principles of engineering, and to perform his work and complete the well in a workmanlike manner. Defendant admitted constructing the well pursuant to a written contract, but denied that he had failed to properly perform the contract; and he counterclaimed to recover, on quantum meruit, for special services and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoffman v. DixonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Butler v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Rupert v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Smith v. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Steubing v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roscoe Moss Co. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Groh v. W. O. Krahn, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- McCaffrey v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Atlas Const. Co., Inc. v. Aqua Drilling Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Charles v. UmentumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.