Legal Opinion

United States v. Aurelio Carrasco Lechuga and Samuel Lechuga

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 22, 1991No. 90-1656, 90-1689PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Samuel Lechuga and Aurelio Carrasco Lechuga were convicted of one count of conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and one count of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute. They appeal their convictions, alleging that the vehicle stop that led to the discovery of evidence introduced by the government at trial was a violation of their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. They also challenge the constitutionality of subsequent searches of the vehicle in which they were driving and an apartment. We…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States v. David Lee GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Spencer Ray TilmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Ruben PereaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Imad Naim Saadeh, Barbara Sudzus, and Albert SudzusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API