Legal Opinion
United States v. Imad Naim Saadeh, Barbara Sudzus, and Albert Sudzus
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 7, 1995No. 93-2681, 93-2682 and 93-2705PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Imad Saadeh, Barbara Sudzus, and Albert Sudzus used a Chicago automobile repair shop as the center for their cocaine distribution business. After a successful drug bust by the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), a jury convicted all three defendants of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute. The defendants now raise a number of challenges to their convictions. For the reasons below, we affirm.
I
Albert (“Al, Jr.”) and his mother, Barbara Sudzus (“Barbara”) ran a Chicago car repair shop called…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Arturo Garcia Parra and Magdalena CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Frank Smith, Keith McCain Russell Ellis, Eric Wilson, Sherman Moore, Steven Pink and Charles PoteeteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.