Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 5, 2009No. Case 08-40019-JARPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant William J. Bell’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 45). The Court has reviewed the briefs and is ready to rule. For the reasons detailed below, defendant’s motion is denied.

Defendant moves to dismiss the Indictment on the basis that the carjacking statute 18 U.S.C. § 2119 is unconstitutional, a facial challenge that the statute exceeds Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. 1 Defendant acknowledges that there is Tenth Circuit precedent upholding the constitutionality of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Villalobos-MaciasDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API