Legal Opinion

Heitzman v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 2, 1928No. 11,863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The hank, defendant in error, had judgment by default against Heitzman, and he brings error.

The action was against Heitzman as an officer or director of The Valley Mercantile Stores Company for failure to file the statutory annual report with the secretary of state, and was based on a promissory note made by said company to the bank upon which a balance was alleged in the complaint to be unpaid. Heitzman took no action in the district court, but sues out his writ of error for errors' alleged to appear in the record proper.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mulock v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Aggers v. People ex rel. MontclairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Emery v. YountSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  4. Knoor v. ReinekeIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Great Western Mushroom Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Peck v. WoomackNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Clark v. FellinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API