Legal Opinion

Knoor v. Reineke

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, C. J.

— This action was commenced for the purpose of setting aside the election of respondents as directors of the Payette-Boise Water Users’ Association in January, 1922, and confirming the election of appellants as such.

The amended complaint alleges that at this election appellants received the highest number of votes cast in the election of directors but that respondents were declared the duly elected members of the board, met and organized, and retained possession of the records. In the complaint appellants specifically set out in detail the alleged wrongs and seek relief that the election of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Porter v. HermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Graves v. BerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Rogers v. McAlisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Casey Pure Milk Co. v. Booth Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Little v. ButnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. In Re Contempt Proceedings of BrainardIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Taylor v. FluhartyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API