Legal Opinion

Johnston v. City of Fort Smith

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 1985No. CA CR 84-176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawson Cloninger, Judge.

The thirteen appellants in this consolidated case attack their convictions under Act 549 of 1983, the Omnibus DWI Act, codified at Ark. Stat. Ann. § 75-2501 et seq. (Supp. 1983). They argue six points for reversal. Although the issues raised are constitutional in character, we are empowered to consider them, notwithstanding the limitation imposed by Rule 29(1 )(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, because our decision involves merely the application of principles established in earlier opinions of the Arkansas Supreme Court. On the basis of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Finney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Loren Ross v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Curtis Valentine a/k/a Curtis Lee Valentine v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Eugene Young v. City of Brookhaven, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API