Legal Opinion
Murphy Bros. Chevrolet Co. v. East Oakland Auto Auction
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 22, 1969No. 5995PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRASER, Chief Justice.
As stated in the brief of appellant, this action is a consolidated action brought originally in two lawsuits, each by East Oakland Auto Auction, a California corporation, against appellant herein, Norman Ca-dle, and Vincent Murphy Chevrolet Company, Inc., with an interpleader taken against E. R. Broom. Uncontested judgment was taken against defendants Norman Cadle and E. R. Broom by appellant and Vincent Murphy Chevrolet Company, Inc., and uncontested judgment was taken against Norman Cadle by East Oakland Auto Auction, and no appeal from such judgment has been…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- City of Texarkana v. WigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Continental Supply Co. v. Forrest E. Gilmore Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Paramount Petroleum Corp. v. Taylor Rental CenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Wortham v. Dow Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Allright Texas, Inc. v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.