Legal Opinion
Russell v. Balcom Chemicals, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1983No. 13520PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
Appellant Russell brought this action based on claims of negligence and strict liability against appellees Balcom and Selco *477for injuries sustained as a result of exposure to sheep tick dust manufactured by appellees. Appellant was a minor at the time of the injury on May 4, 1975, and attained his majority on September 7, 1977. Service of the summons and complaint was not made on any of the appellees until after August 1980. All appellees appeared and by answer raised the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations, moving for summary judgment on that basis. Russell…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Donald Bruce Sondergard v. Miles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Burke v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. American Bankers Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Frankenfeld v. Crompton Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.