Frankenfeld v. Crompton Corp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KEAN, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] Crompton Corporation and its subsidiaries, Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc. and Uniroyal Chemical Company (collectively Crompton), as well as Flexsys N.V. and Flexsys America L.P. (collectively Flexsys) appeal the circuit court’s denial of their motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because we hold that personal jurisdiction over these defendants violates due process we reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
[¶ 2.] Don Frankenfeld (Frankenfeld), individually and on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, brought this action against multiple…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Merriman v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Grajczyk v. TascaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Daktronics, Inc. v. LBW Tech Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Marschke v. WratislawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re the Matter of J.D.M.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.