Legal Opinion

Bachman v. Gogel

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

Decided November 3, 1970No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANCIOSA, J.,

Plaintiff filed his complaint in equity for an injunction restraining defendants from directly or indirectly engaging in the business of plaintiff, except on behalf of plaintiff. In addition, he requests that defendants be required to account for profits derived from engaging in plaintiff’s line of business, and to pay him such damages as he has sustained in consequence of their conduct.

Defendants filed responsive answers and new matter consisting of a counterclaim. The counterclaim, in an amount of not less than $2,000, was based on allegations that plaintiff has interfered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris Calorific Co. v. MarraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Holland v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Stofflet v. StoffletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API