Legal Opinion

Holland v. Brown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1931No. Appeal, 108PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

The present appeal is from a decree restraining defendants from violating the provisions of a merger con tract by which they and others bound themselves not to enter into the dairy business in competition with the Valley Dairy Company.

Previous to March, 1925, sixteen dairymen and dealers in dairy products, who comprise plaintiffs or defendants in this proceeding, had conducted their businesses independently of each other in a number of boroughs and townships contiguous to and near by the Borough of East Pittsburgh in Allegheny County. Before March 1, 1925,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co. v. StantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Sklaroff v. SklaroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris Calorific Co. v. MarraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Seligman & Latz of Pittsburgh, Inc. v. VernilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Automotive Devices Co. v. Automotive Devices Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Ashodian v. Garabedian, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1970
  5. Bachman v. Gogel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API