Legal Opinion

Harris Calorific Co. v. Marra

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1942No. Appeal, 132PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

The question raised by this appeal in a proceeding in equity is whether a written contract between the parties is enforceable. The court below found that the agreement constituted an illegal restraint of trade. We have come to a different conclusion.

In October, 1939, Harris Calorific Company, the plaintiff, was engaged in the manufacture and sale of welding and cutting apparatus, especially cutting and welding torches. It disposed of its product through various dealers and distributors; it employed no salesmen but it did service its products. The Welders Service…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Smith's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. JutteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Knapp v. S. Jarvis Adams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  5. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co. v. StantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Sidco Paper Company v. AaronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Plunkett Chemical Co. v. ReeveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API