Legal Opinion

Landstrom v. Shaver

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1996No. 19490-19492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] In these consolidated cases, Land-strom filed a “Motion for Adequate Bond or, Alternatively, to Either Dismiss the Appeals or Vacate the Stay of Execution.” We grant the motion and require appellants to file an adequate bond.

FACTS

[¶ 2] Inez L. Shaver, Special Administrator of the Estate of J. Milton P. Shaver (“Shaver”), Jack Devereaux (“Devereaux”), and Constance J. Drew (“Drew”) each appealed from judgments in favor of Jo Landstrom, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for her minor daughter Katheryn E. Drenker, and Kara Dee Drenker (collectively referred to as “Landstrom”) in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Delzer v. PennSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Scott v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sioux Falls Argus Leader v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Palmer v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Vitek v. Bon Homme County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Healy v. OsborneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In Re Estate of HoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API