Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Howe

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2004No. NonePublished

1Opinion of the Court

689 N.W.2d 22 (2004)

2004 SD 118

ESTATE OF Edna Jane HOWE.

Nos. 22901, 22917, 22957, 22983.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued March 22, 2004.

Decided October 20, 2004.

Candi Thomson and Keith R. Smit of Morman Law Firm, Sturgis, South Dakota, Attorneys for appellant Randolph Howe.

Jeff Adel and Casey N. Bridgman of Bridgman and Adel, Wessington Springs, South Dakota, Attorney for appellant Lance Howe.

Rick Johnson and Sandy Steffen of Johnson, Eklund, Nicholson & Peterson, Gregory, South Dakota, Attorneys for appellee Michael Howe.

JENSEN, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] Randolph Howe (Randolph) and Lance…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API