Legal Opinion

Pennefeather v. City of Kenosha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellants claim (1) that the condemnation proceedings are wholly void for want of allegation in the petition and for want of proof that the premises to be *698condemned could not be acquired by gift or purchase at an agreed price; (2) that the proceedings are void for failure to file with the register of deeds a notice of pendency of the proceedings as required by statute; and ( 3 ) that the proceedings, if valid, condemn the entire tract of the plaintiffs, and that the valuation of the entire tract as determined by the commissioners was not paid into court on the appeal of the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. Minnesota & Northwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Skalicky v. Friendship Electric Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Winnebago Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Wisconsin Midland RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. City of Milwaukee v. DillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belleville State Bank v. SteeleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gaugert v. DuveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hailey v. ZachariasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API