Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Diller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

In State ex rel. Allis v. Wiesner, 187 Wis. 384, 204 N. W. 589, this court held the jury provision of ch. VI of the Milwaukee city charter, with reference to the necessity of taking property by condemnation, was unconstitutional. The appellant now seeks to determine the necessity for the taking of property under the procedure of sub. (1), sec. 32.07, Stats., and then to acquire the property by virtue of the city charter provisions, following the unconstitutional provisions of the charter.

The questions involved may be simply stated. Did the decision of this court in the Wiesner Case, supra,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Lancashire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Adams v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Allis v. WiesnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State ex rel. Boycott v. Mayor of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. City of Big Rapids v. Big Rapids Furniture Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hasslinger v. Village of HartlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Bremerton Bridge Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Application of Loup River Public Power Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Benka v. Consolidated Water Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kultgen v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API