Legal Opinion

Vossen v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 2000No. C6-99-1666PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Arnold P. Vossen executed a mortgage and promissory note in favor of respondent Kenneth R. Parker. More than 15 years later, Parker began foreclosure proceedings. Vossen sued, claiming that the statute of limitations barred the foreclosure. The district court enjoined the foreclosure proceedings. Vossen sought partial summary judgment; the court denied, the motion. After a jury trial, the court granted judgment for Parker and dissolved the injunction. After amended findings and an amended judgment, Vossen appealed. We reverse.

FACTS

The parties have stipulated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeSalle v. Gibraltar Title Agency L.L.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. DeSalle v. Gibraltar Title Agency L.L.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Lorenzo Reed v. Westgate Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API