Legal Opinion · Concurrence

DeSalle v. Gibraltar Title Agency L.L.C.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 2000No. C6-00-749Published

1ConcurrenceCrippen, Judge

The legislature does not intend a result that is absurd or unreasonable. Minn. Stat. § 645.17 (2000). This elementary rule of statutory construction dictates that we reverse the trial court’s application of Minn.Stat. § 541.03, subd. 2.

I agree with our application of Polish Union v. Kruszewski, 171 Minn. 252, 253, 213 N.W. 913 (1927). Polish Union does not purport to establish a minimum level of clarity. We have properly said that a clear statement of maturity is one that is “ascertainable from the mortgage itself.” Vossen v. Parker, 609 N.W.2d 290, 293 (Minn.App.2000). There are additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vossen v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Polish Union of the United States v. KruzewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API