Legal Opinion

Oss v. Depositors' Guaranty Fund Commission

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1925No. File No. 5904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the Depositors’ Guaranty Fund- Commission to pay to the depositors of the failed Bank of Herrick the amount of their deposits. Involved in the proceeding are the construction and interpretation of chapter 99, Laws 1925 (S. B. 165) and chapter 100, Laws 1925 (S. B. 269).

One of the grounds upon which defendants move to quash the order to show cause is that this is not a cause of which this court should take original jurisdiction. The reasons therefor are thus stated in the motion to quash:

“That no facts sufficient to call into exercise the original…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Everitt v. Board County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Sharpe v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Putnam v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gibbs v. BerghSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API