Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. County of Kane

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1980No. 79-454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward

Plaintiffs, certain property owners, brought this action seeking a declaration that a special use ordinance was invalid, and an injunction against defendants’ development of property pursuant to that ordinance. Plaintiffs now appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint on the ground of laches.

In September of 1969 the Kane County board of supervisors enacted an ordinance granting a special use for a restricted landing area to be developed in the northwest comer of Kane County. In April of 1979 this suit was filed by plaintiffs challenging the validity of the ordinance by raising…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perlman v. First National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Freymark v. HandkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. DuMond v. City of MattoonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. La Salle National Bank v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. City of Chicago v. AtkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Cook County Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Ford City Bank & Trust Co. v. County of KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Mogul v. TuckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API