Legal Opinion
Perlman v. First National Bank of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 5, 1973No. 57436PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan
The plaintiffs, Harold L. Perlman, individually and as the controlling member of, and as agent for 1000 Lake Shore Drive, a joint venture, and Continental Sales & Enterprises, Inc. filed a three-count complaint on behalf of themselves and as representatives on behalf of all other persons similarly situated against the defendant, the First National Bank of Chicago, hereafter referred to as “the Bank.” Count III was stricken on the Bank’s motion.
Count I aHeged as follows:
1000 Lake Shore Drive executed and delivered a promissory note dated May 31, 1965, prepared by the Bank for a loan of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Hickey v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Shaw v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Peoples Store of Roseland v. McKibbinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Elmo E. Koos, Sr. And Caroline M. Koos v. First National Bank of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- In the Matter of Pubs, Inc. Of Champaign, Bankrupt. Appeal of Bank of Illinois in Champaign, ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Cope v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.