Legal Opinion

Stone v. Union Pacific Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1909No. 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Second District Court Weber County.— Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action to recover damages for tbe death.of plaintiff’s,intestate, alleged to bave been caused' by tbe negligence of tbe defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff, tbe defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFeign, J.

Tbis is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent entered ini an action brought by him to recover damages for the death of bis intestate, alleged to bave been caused by tbe negligence of tbe appellant. Tbe death resulted from a collision of a passenger train and a freight train run in opposite directions over tbe defendant’s line of railroad .near Azusa in tbe state of Wyoming. Deceased was in defendant’s employ, and was tbe engineer of tbe freight train, designated “Extra 1,661,” tbe number of tbe engine drawing tbe train. Tbe train’ consisted of tbirtv-one loaded freight cars…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Naylor v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hewitt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Little Rock & M. R. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. McLeod v. Ginther's adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  5. Tinkcom v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stone v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Olsen v. Triangle Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API