Legal Opinion

Young v. COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 28, 2010No. Civil Action 09-464 (RBW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Yolanda Young, brings this action against the defendant, the law firm of Covington & Burling, LLP (“Covington”), alleging that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-3(a), 16(a)(2006) (“Title VH”) and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“Human Rights Act”), D.C.Code §§ 2-1401.01, 2-1402.11(a)(l), and 2-1402.61(a) & (b) (2006), when it allegedly discriminated against her based on race during her employment at Covington and then retaliated against her based on her complaints…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Simms v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Young v. Covington & Burling LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Young v. COVINGTON & BURLING LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Simms v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API