Legal Opinion
Carroll v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1949No. 10800PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal allowed in forma pauperis by the district court from the denial of appellant’s motion for vacation and correction of sentence. On guilty plea, appellant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment on each of two counts of an indictment charging violation of section 409 of the Criminal Code, U.S.C.A., Title 18, section 409 [now § 659],
The first count charged appellant with stealing goods from an interstate shipment of freight, and the second count charged him with having in his possession such goods, knowing the same to have been stolen. The sentences of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lockhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Blockburger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Carpenter v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Carroll v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pedro Amado Torres v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Anthony Cusumano, Michael John McCarthy Eugene Arthur Riggio, Anthony Suppa and James TestaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- William Howard Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Jerry Michael Solimine, in No. 75-1867. Appeal of Samuel A. Sclafani, in No. 75-2134. Appeal of Julio Joseph Piscopo, in No. 75-2369Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Lipscomb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.