Carroll v. Sanford
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Section 409 of Title 18 U.S.C.A., punishes not only those who steal interstate freight but also whoever “shall buy or receive or have in his possession any such goods or chattels knowing the same to have been stolen”. The thief can, after stealing, have in his possession the stolen property knowing the same to have been stolen, and thus commit a further and different offense, and be punished for both. United States v. Dunbar, 7 Cir., 149 .F. 2d 151; Carpenter v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 112 F.2d 126. We do not say that the possession involved in the act of stealing would suffice, because the goods…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carpenter v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pedro Amado Torres v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- United States v. CordoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. DolascoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States v. SegelmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.