Legal Opinion
Does 1 v. Chandler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1996No. 95-17245PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 F.3d 1150
64 USLW 2735, 5 A.D. Cases 849, 15
A.D.D. 640, 8 NDLR P 78,
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3466
John DOES 1-5, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated; Jane Doe, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Susan M. CHANDLER, Ph.D., Director of the Department of
Human Services, a duly organized and recognized agency of
the State of Hawaii; Patricia Murakami, Acting
Administrator, Family & Adult Services Division, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-17245.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 11, 1996.
Decided May…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harmon E. Welsh v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Demery v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.