Legal Opinion

Howard v. General Petroleum Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1951No. Civ. 18468PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of non-suit rendered after the action for the recovery of oil royalties had been fully tried and all the evidence of the defendants, as well as that of the plaintiffs, was before the court. We are satisfied that the judgment should be reversed with instructions to the trial court to make findings and conclusions of law and to render judgment thereon. The evidence of plaintiffs, when given full credit and effect, would have entitled them to some relief. It was therefore error to grant a nonsuit. The evidence of the defendants, however, presented the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Karallis v. ShenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Keen v. PrisinzanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Croslin v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Howard v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Howard v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API